The Unbuilt Architects: Pioneering the Future of Design Through AI and Digital Platforms

How AI Prompting and Midjourney Platforms Are Shaping a New Genre of Architects Who Never Build

Bahram H Yousefi, Dr. techn.
8 min readOct 8, 2023
Midjourney, Milad Ziya

The role of an architect has traditionally been to design structures that will eventually be built, lived in, and experienced in three dimensions. However, we’re entering an era where architects can be influential without ever seeing their designs materialize in the physical world. With the advancement of technology, architects now have the opportunity to create environments and immersive experiences that transcend physical limitations allowing them to engage with clients and stakeholders in a more interactive and dynamic way. This shift opens up new possibilities for architectural innovation and experimentation, blurring the boundaries between the real and virtual worlds. These are the Un-built Architects. Leveraging AI prompting and platforms like Midjourney, they are not just creating structures but are shaping experiences, narratives, and even new paradigms of understanding space. By harnessing AI prompting and platforms like Midjourney, Un-built Architects are able to push the boundaries of traditional architectural practices. They can explore complex design concepts and simulate their impact on the environment, allowing for more sustainable and efficient structures. Additionally, AI prompting and platforms like Midjourney enable architects to collaborate with peers from various fields to create innovative solutions that address the challenges of the future. This eventually interdisciplinary approach ensures that architects are not limited by their own expertise but can draw on the knowledge and skills of professionals in other disciplines. By incorporating diverse perspectives, Unbuilt Architects can develop more holistic and comprehensive designs that consider social, economic, and cultural factors alongside technical considerations.

The Historical Context: Visionaries of the Past

[The Unbuilt Legacy: Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright]

Le Corbusier, a pioneer of modern architecture, had several projects that never saw the light of day. One such example is his “Plan Voisin,” a radical redesign of central Paris. The plan proposed to demolish a significant portion of the Marais district to make way for eighteen identical glass towers. Financial constraints, public outcry, and the sheer audacity of the project made it unfeasible. However, the ideas it presented — urban renewal, high-density housing, and the use of green spaces — have been dissected and discussed in academic settings for decades. The Plan Voisin was a precursor to the Brutalist movement and has influenced urban planning theories, even though it was never built.

Le Corbusier’s Plan Voisin for Paris

Frank Lloyd Wright, another luminary in the architectural world, also had designs that remained on paper. One of the most famous is the “Mile-High Illinois,” a skyscraper intended to be a mile high, envisioned in 1956. Technological limitations of the time made the project impossible, but it sparked conversations about the future of skyscraper design and urban density. The design utilized a taproot structural system, which has since been studied as an innovative approach to managing structural loads in tall buildings.

Frank Lloyd Wright’s Mile High Skyscraper Proposal — On Verticality

Both architects faced various constraints that kept their visionary projects unbuilt. Financial limitations are often the most straightforward: ambitious projects require significant capital investment, which may not always be available. Technological constraints also play a role; the materials and engineering solutions needed for some of these designs simply did not exist at the time. Societal norms and resistance to change can be the most challenging constraints to overcome. The audacity to reimagine an entire neighborhood or propose a mile-high skyscraper often meets with public resistance, rooted in the fear of the unknown or the unwillingness to disrupt historical and cultural landscapes.

The New Paradigm: Unbuilt Architects

The un-built projects of Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright [as examples] serve as a testament to the enduring power of ideas. They challenge the notion that a design’s value is solely in its physical manifestation. In a digital age where the line between the built and the unbuilt is increasingly blurred, these projects remind us that architecture is, at its core, the art of possibility. Unbuilt Architects are a new breed of professionals who may never see their designs come to life in the traditional sense. Unlike their predecessors, they are not constrained by budgets, gravity, or even the laws of physics. They design experiences and narratives, not just structures. The digital realm offers unparalleled freedom but also raises questions about the value and impact of designs that remain unbuilt. Is a design less valuable if it exists only in the digital ether? The answer is complex and challenges our traditional understanding of architecture.

Let’s talk about constraints for a moment. Traditional architects operate within a sandbox of building codes, zoning laws, and budget constraints. But unbuilt architects? Their sandbox is as boundless as their imagination. They’re not just thinking outside the box; they’re redefining the box itself. But here’s the kicker: with great freedom comes great responsibility. The absence of constraints doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to create designs that are ethical, equitable, and sustainable. In fact, it amplifies it.

You see, the digital realm is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it democratizes architecture, making it accessible to anyone with a laptop and a dream. On the other hand, it risks turning architecture into a spectator sport, something to be consumed rather than lived. So, the question isn’t whether a design loses its value if it’s never built. The question is: does the design contribute to the collective imagination? Does it challenge us to see the world differently? Does it make us better?

The unbuilt architects are not just artists; they’re alchemists. They transform pixels and bytes into experiences and emotions. They understand that in the digital age, the most valuable real estate is not physical; it’s mental. It’s the space in people’s minds where ideas take root and grow. And in that space, the possibilities are endless.

So, the next time you find yourself scrolling through a portfolio of digital renderings, ask yourself: is this just eye candy, or is it soul food? Because the unbuilt architects are serving up a feast, and we’re all invited to the table. The unbuilt is not a compromise; it’s a canvas. And on that canvas, we can paint not just buildings, but also the future. Welcome to the age of the unbuilt architect. It’s not just a profession; it’s a revolution.

The Role of AI Prompting

AI is more than just a tool for these architects; it’s a collaborator. It can offer design suggestions, simulate environmental conditions, and even bring ethical considerations to the table. For instance, AI algorithms have been used to optimize building layouts for maximum energy efficiency. While these designs may remain unbuilt, they contribute to a growing body of knowledge that could shape future built projects. However, the use of AI also raises ethical questions about originality and the role of the human designer. Are we approaching a future where AI will be the primary creator?

Midjourney, Milad Ziya

Midjourney and Other Digital Platforms

Platforms like Midjourney [and also some other platforms] offer a space for Unbuilt Architects to showcase their designs, collaborate with others, and even monetize their work. These platforms are democratizing architecture, making it accessible to people who may not have traditional architectural training but possess vision and creativity.

Ah, the dance between AI and architecture — a tango of ones and zeros, a ballet of algorithms and aesthetics. If you’re still thinking of AI as just a fancy calculator, it’s time to recalibrate your perspective. AI isn’t just a tool in the architect’s toolkit; it’s a full-fledged partner in the creative process.

Let’s get real for a moment. The challenges we face today — climate change, social inequality, urban sprawl — are complex, multifaceted beasts. They’re not going to be tamed by traditional approaches alone. Enter AI, the ultimate multi-tasker. It can crunch numbers, yes, but it can also crunch concepts, paradigms, and even ethics. Imagine an algorithm that doesn’t just optimize for energy efficiency but also for social equity. Imagine a design process where AI serves as both a mirror and a window — reflecting our values while opening new vistas of possibility.

But hold on, let’s pump the brakes for a second. With all this talk of AI as a collaborator, are we sidelining the human element? Are we inching towards a future where the architect’s role is reduced to that of a curator, sifting through AI-generated options? It’s a provocative question, and it’s one that we can’t afford to ignore. The relationship between AI and architecture isn’t just a technological issue; it’s an existential one. It challenges us to redefine what it means to be a creator in an age of algorithms.

Here’s the thing: originality isn’t about pulling ideas out of thin air; it’s about connecting dots in new and meaningful ways. AI can generate dots by the millions, but it’s the human architect who weaves them into a tapestry of meaning. It’s the human touch that infuses data with soul, that turns information into inspiration. So, no, we’re not approaching a future where AI is the primary creator. We’re approaching a future where the line between human and machine is not a boundary but a bridge.

The unbuilt designs of the AI era are not just pixels on a screen; they’re signposts pointing towards a new kind of architecture — one that’s rooted in data but elevated by empathy. They serve as both a challenge and a promise — a challenge to expand our notion of what’s possible, and a promise that even in a world of algorithms, the human spirit remains the ultimate X factor.

So, as we navigate this brave new world of AI and architecture, let’s not lose sight of the forest for the trees. Let’s remember that technology is most powerful when it amplifies our humanity, not when it replaces it. In the symphony of progress, AI may be a dazzling soloist, but it’s the human conductor that brings the music to life. Welcome to the era of the AI-augmented architect. It’s not just a trend; it’s a transformation.

Conclusion

The world of architecture is expanding, and Unbuilt Architects are at the forefront of this revolution. Their work challenges us to rethink what architecture is and what it could be. As we move into an increasingly digital future, let’s embrace the possibilities that come with it, even if those possibilities are unbuilt. After all, in the realm of ideas, nothing is more powerful than a vision that challenges the status quo.

DALL-E, by Bahram Hooshyar Yousefi, Dr. techn.
DALL E. Vector artwork of a large holographic building projection in a public square, with diverse people of various ages and descent marveling and interacting with the projection. The hologram showcases a futuristic architectural design. Bahram

Despite remaining unbuilt, these kind of designs have found a second life in architectural education. They are studied not as failures but as visionary projects that push the boundaries of what is possible. They serve as thought experiments that challenge students and professionals alike to think beyond the limitations of their time. The theoretical contributions of these unbuilt projects have permeated architectural discourse, influencing new generations of architects to push the boundaries of design and imagination.

--

--

Bahram H Yousefi, Dr. techn.
Bahram H Yousefi, Dr. techn.

Written by Bahram H Yousefi, Dr. techn.

I write on Design, Cognification/Innervation, Gamification & Entrepreneurship. As a coach & instructor, I merge knowledge with innovation. http://bhy.solutions/

No responses yet